All Macs In-Depth Tests
Books & Buyer's Guides

New - Ed- Free iPod Touch, - With Computer Purchase

Books
Using iLife ... Books
Using iWork ... Books
Using The iPod ... Books
All Books On Apple Products ...

Information Hubs



Other Product Information


Site Supporters

send this page

Send to a friend

News Feed

Mailing list ...List information...


 
MacSpeedZone Gift Shop



The SpeedZone: Sure The New Dual G4/1.25 GHz Tower Is Faster Than The Single G4/1 GHz .. But By How Much? A Tale Of The Two Towers!
Check prices at: ....

Apple Store
Education Discounts
Closeout/Refurb
Amazon.com
PowerMax

MacConnection
MacMall
ClubMac
MacZone


Additional Resources

iMac Buyer's Guide
iMac InfoZone
iMac Performance
iMac Performance vs Other Models
iMac Reviews
iMac Specs & Features
iMac Discussion Forum
Performance of all Macs
Performance article index

Tuesday, March 11, 2003

by David Engstrom

Below we take a look at the relative performances of the current low-end and middle of the road Power Mac Tower models from Apple. Aside from clock speed, the main difference between these two machines is that one comes with a single G4 processor and the other comes with two. Both machines have 256k of L2 cache (per processor), both have 1 MB of L3 cache (per processor). However the single processor Tower has a bus speed that clocks in at 133 MHz and the dual 1.25's bus runs at 167 MHz. This is not a great speed difference and probably had little, if any, effect on the performance results listed below.

The two machines also have different graphics cards. The single processor machine an NVIDIA card and the dual processor machine an ATI card. Both come with 64 MB of video memory.

What kind of effect do these differences have on performance? In most tests that required heavy processing activity, and that could take advantage of dual processors, the dual 1.25 GHz machine pulled significantly ahead. However the dual processor Tower left a lot of its processing power on the table, unused by the application that was running. For example in one of our Photoshop tests only 55% of the processing capability of the dual processor machine was used. 45% of the machine's data crunching ability was left idling, waiting for 1s and 0s that never came. This situation repeated itself in many of our other single application tests. Somewhere along the data feed chain there is a bottle neck that keeps data from arriving fast enough to keep the processors fed. Since it is possible to saturate the processors, both with specialized single applications, and when running multiple processes from more than one application, our guess is that the bottle neck is not at the hardware level, but the software level .. or perhaps at the level where the two meet. But we are speculating here. In any case, in environments where you want to be running multiple processes at once, a dual processor machine becomes much more attractive, perhaps even essential.

It also appears, at least from our testing, that, depending on the game, a dual processor machine will greatly out class a single processor machine when playing games.

Difference and similarities of each machine
  Power Mac Dual G4/1000 Power Mac G41GHz MHz
Single Processor (#M8839LL/A )

Power Mac G4/1.25 GHz
Dual Processor (#M8840LL/A )

Processors 2 x G4/1000 G4/1 GHz 2 x G4/1.25 GHz
L2 Cache 256k @ 1000 MHz 256K L2 @ 1GHz 256K L2 @ 1.25 GHz
L3 Cache 1MB DDR SRAM per processor 1MB 1MB per processor
Bus Speed 167 MHz 133 MHz 167 MHz
Memory 1 GB PC2100 266MHz DDR SDRAM (2 GB max) 1 GB PC2100
266MHz DDR SDRAM
2 GB max
1 GB PC2700
333MHz DDR SDRAM
2 GB max
Graphics Card ATI Radeon 9000 Pro with 64MB of DDR SDRAM NVIDIA GeForce4 MX
64MB of DDR SDRAM
ATI Radeon 9000 Pro
64MB of DDR SDRAM
Drive 80GB Ultra ATA/100; 7200 rpm 60 GB Ultra ATA/100
7200 rpm
80 GB Ultra ATA/100
7200 rpm
CD Drive SuperDrive 2x 6x8x 4x 24x Reads DVDs at 12x
Writes CD-R at 32x
Writes CD-RW at 10x
Reads CDs at 32x
Reads DVDs at 12x
Writes CD-R at 32x
Writes CD-RW at 10x
Reads CDs at 32x
Operating System 10.2 10.2.3 10.2.3
Price $2,499 $1,299 $1,799

"Real World" Tests

For the graphs below frame rates were converted to percentages, relative to the Power Mac Dual G4/1000, which is set to 100%. For all scores, higher numbers are better.


Desktop Tests    

Re-Boot Test

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 84% 98%

Copy 60 MB Folder

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 103% 117%

The copy folder test not only stresses drive performance but also takes advantage of faster processing capability & caching schemes.

Copy 128 MB File

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 101% 92%

In the single file test the the processor & caching capability of the machine is less of a factor. Drive performance is pretty evenly matched here

Import QuickTime DV Into iMovie

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 96% 141%

In this test only 55% of the processing power of the Dual 1.25 GHz Tower was being used, while 100% of the single processor machine's was. This is good news if you want to do other chores with your Tower while you import that  50 GB movie. It is bad news if you don't. There is some bottleneck in the process that keeps the dual processor machine from performing up to its potential .. wasting valuable processing capacity. Perhaps the drive is not feeding data quickly enough to the processor or there is some limiting factor in the software itself. Still if you are doing this type of work a dual processor machine makes a lot of sense.

Burn CD

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 147% 147%

CD burning only uses a fraction of the processor to get the work done. Both the single processor machine and the dual 1.25 have the same Combo drive that burns CD's at up to 32X. Our stock machine burns CDs at up to 8X.

Let 1000 Windows Bloom

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 103% 128%

Let 1K Windows Bloom is a simple carbon application that opens and closes 1,000 windows. This gauges how fast screen redraws are taking place. Though our stock machine and the dual 1.25 GHz have the same graphics card, the extra processing muscle puts the 1.25 over the top.

Large Document & Database Type Tests

Microsoft Office X Word Macro

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 94% 120%

A Macro (series of complex actions) was run in Microsoft's Excel spreadsheet program. Excel is part of Office X

Microsoft Office X Excel Macro

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 90% 114%

A Macro (series of complex actions) was run in Microsoft's Excel spreadsheet program. Excel is part of Office X

AppleWorks Search And Replace Test

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 95% 116%

This test takes place in a large AppleWorks document. Machines with larger chip caches usually do better in this test

Finder File Search

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 87% 112%

Mac OS X's new File Search function relies on both processor and drive performance




Number Crunching & Rendering Tests

Photoshop 7 - BareFeat's Test

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 77% 126%

BareFeats Photoshop Test Suite - mimics a production type workflow in Photoshop. In the single processor Tower, the processor was saturated with data. The 1.25 GHz machine had 25% left unused.

Photoshop 7 - AltiVec Tests

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 63% 114%

Certain of the functions of Photoshop can take special performance advantage of the G4 processor. A dual processor machine runs rings around a the single processor one, in this test.

Photoshop 7 - Normal Tests

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 94% 124%

The test above consists of Photoshop functions that do not take any particular advantage of the G4. The reason that the dual processor machines don't show more of a performance gap is that 45% to 50% of the processing power those machines was not being utilized. So having an extra processor was not much of an advantage ... unless you wanted to do something else at the same time.

iMovie - Effect Render

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 68% 126%

An Effect Render is run on an movie using iMovie. This tests takes advantage of dual processors.

AltiVec Fractal (Carbon)

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 50% 125%

The Fractal program has been highly tuned to take advantage of the G4 and is precisely the type of work that the G4 was made for. It will also gobble up whatever processing capability is present. This is a good test for assessing the fundamental processing potential of each machine. Really highlights the processing advantage of a dual processor machine


Encoding/Decoding Tests

QuickTime Encode

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 88% 112%

A QuickTime encode compresses a QuickTime movie for streaming on the Web. Only 50% of the processing power of the dual processor machines was used

QuickTime Convert To DV Stream

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 82% 126%

Converting QuickTime movies to DV allows you to import them into iMovie. 60% to 70% of the processing power of the dual processor machines was used.

iTunes - MP3 Encode From CD

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 101% 106%

During the encode 65% of the processing capacity of the dual processor machine was used. Is the CD drive speed a bottle neck?

StuffIt Expand

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 93% 126%

StuffIt does not take advantage of dual processors


Multitasking

iTunes MP3 Encode + AppleWorks Search & Replace + Finder Copy (Multitasking)

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 75% 116%

MP3 Encode, AppleWorks search & replace and folder copy are all carried out at the same time. In a production type environment the Dual Processor Towers make a lot of sense ... if you do some planning.

QuickTime Encode + Fractal (Multitasking)

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 52% 113%

QuickTime Encode and Fractal render are both carried out at the same time.

QuickTime DV + iMovie Effect Render (Multitasking)

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 56% 124%

QuickTime DV Encode and iMovie Effect are performed at the same time. Dual Processor machines rule the day

MP3 Encode + Photoshop Normal + Word Macro (Multitasking)

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Scores as percentage of Power Mac Dual G4/1 GHz 100% 96% 116%

The MP3 Encode, Photoshop Normal and Word Macro tests are all run at the same time


Gaming

Giants Highest Frame Rates

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Actual Frame Rates 105 62 133

Giants Average Frame Rates

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Actual Frame Rates 45 25.2 47

Giants Lowest Frame Rates

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Actual Frame Rates 21 13.9 25

4x4 EVO 2 Average Frame Rates- High Quality Setting

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Actual Frame Rates 18 17 25

4x4 EVO 2 Average Frame Rates- Medium Quality Setting

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Actual Frame Rates 30 26 39

4x4 EVO 2 Average Frame Rates- Low Quality Setting

Machine Power Mac Dual 1 GHz Power Mac Single G4/1 GHz Power Mac Dual G4/1.25 GHz
Actual Frame Rates 42 36 52

For very demanding games you can't beat a Tower .. at least not yet



Top of page

 

Copyright 1996-2007 by Cider Press Publishing LLC all rights reserved. MacSpeedZone is not authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Computer. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iPod, iBook, iMac, eMac, and PowerBook are registered trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.

|