|
Friday, April 12,
2002
The G4 iMac and the Power Mac G4/800 are very
similar in some ways. They both have the same processor, running
at the same speed and they both lack a L3 backside cache.
So in raw processing power they should weigh in about the
same. They do in some of our tests below, where only raw processing
power is called for. However in many of the tests we ran,
that are also processor focused, the iMac ran about 10-15%
behind the Power Mac Tower. What is the reason for this? We
believe that it is the slower System bus on the iMac that
is, for the most part, responsible for the performance gap
between the two machine. The iMac has a System bus running
at 100 MHz and on the Power Mac the System bus runs at 133
MHz.
The Tower machine is, of course, much more upgradable
than the iMac. You can add multiple drives to the machine,
PCI cards and more RAM to them. However if you don't need
these things, the new iMac will turn in close to the same
performance as the low-end Tower, and will take up a lot less
spaces in your work area.
Which Mac would you buy? Let
us know why
Difference and similarities in processor and
memory & graphics systems of each machine
| |
iMac G4/800 |
Power Mac G4/800 |
Additional Resources

|
| Processors |
G4/800 |
G4/800 |
| L2 Cache |
256k @ 800 MHz |
256k @ 800 MHz |
| L3 Cache |
None |
None |
| Memory |
768 MB PC 133 |
768 MB PC 133 |
| Graphics Card |
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX with 32 MB of DDR RAM in a 2x AGP
slot |
ATI RADEON 7500 with 32MB DDR SDRAM in 4x AGP slot |
| Drive |
60GB Ultra ATA |
40 GB Ultra ATA @ 7200 rpm |
| Operating System |
10.1.2 |
10.1.2 |
| Price |
$1,899 |
$1,599 |
"Real World" Tests
The tests below are from our suite of real world application
tests. These tests feature a diverse selection of applications
commonly used by the Mac community. The test suite was designed
to render an accurate and well rounded picture of a machine's
performance. All of the tests below, except for the game tests,
were timed with a stopwatch. The times were then converted
to percentages, relative to the Power Mac G4/800, which is
set to 100%. For all scores, higher numbers are better.
Desktop Tests
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 44.02 sec
.... iMac G4/800: 48.13 sec
Pretty evenly matched. The slightly slower
iMac is probably due to slower drive performance
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 32.14 sec Processor usage:
80% .... iMac G4/800: 41.24 sec Processor usage: 75%
Better processor usage in the Power Mac may
indicated that the drive is not getting data to the iMac's
processor as fast or perhaps the iMac's slower System bus
(100 MHz as opposed to 133 on the Power Mac), and the faster
RAM on the Power Mac are factors
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 12.15 sec
Processor usage: 40% .... iMac G4/800: 20.25 sec Processor
usage: 35%
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 9.91 sec Processor
usage: 20% .... iMac G4/800: 10.71 sec Processor usage: 20%
The first drive test above stresses different,
and more intensive, drive activity than the second. The Folder
test has a little over 1,000 files in it, of various sizes.
You can see by the processor usage numbers, that the Folder
test takes up more of the processor's computational capability
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 80.84 sec
Processor usage: 15% .... iMac G4/800: 120.15 sec Processor
usage: 15%
This is basically SuperDrive (iMac) vs the Power
Mac's solo CD-RW drive. Since the SuperDrive burns at a rate
of 8X, and the Power Mac's CD-RW drive burns at 3 times that
rate, the results above are no surprise
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 47.39 sec
Processor usage: 100% .... iMac G4/800: 52.79 sec Processor
usage: 100%
The test above creates and destroys 1,000 windows.
See the Let1kWindowsBloom
site for more info. The iMac has the NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
with 32 MB of DDR RAM in a 2x AGP slot, and the Power Mac
the ATI RADEON 7500 with 32MB DDR SDRAM in 4x AGP slot
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 21.68 sec
Processor usage: 50% .... iMac G4/800: 26.09 sec Processor
usage: 50%
Large document is scrolled from one end to
the other using Classic OS 9.2.2 when booted in OS 10.
Large Document & Database Type Tests
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 106.54 sec
, Processor usage: 100% .... iMac G4/800: 116.91 sec Processor
usage: 100%
A Macro (series of complex actions) was run
in Microsoft's Word program, which is part of Office
X
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 71.07 sec
, Processor usage: 100%. .... iMac G4/800:78.93 sec Processor
usage: 100%
A Macro (series of complex actions) was run
in Microsoft's Excel program, which is part of Office
X
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 29.14 sec
, Processor usage: 100% .... iMac G4/800: 33.63 sec Processor
usage: 100%
This test takes place in a large AppleWorks
document.
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 64.43 sec
Processor usage: 95% .... iMac G4/800: 67.56 sec Processor
usage: 95%
Large folder is indexed by Apple's search
application
Number Crunching & Rendering Tests
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 206.03 sec
Processor usage: 100% .... iMac G4/800: 234.16 sec Processor
usage: 100%
A Ripple Effect is applied to an iMovie
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 66.55 sec
Processor usage: 100% .... iMac G4/800: 67.09 sec Processor
usage: 100%
The Fractal
program has been highly tuned to take advantage of the G4
and is precisely the type of work that the G4 was made for.
It will also gobble up whatever processing capability is present.
This is a good test for assessing the fundamental processing
power of each machine
Encoding/Decoding Tests
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 248.64 sec
Processor usage: 100% .... iMac G4/800: 272.76 sec Processor
usage: 100%
A Sorenson
encode compresses a QuickTime movie for streaming on the Web
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 172.27 sec
Processor usage: 100% .... iMac G4/800: 173.94 sec Processor
usage: 100%
Converting QuickTime
movies to DV allows you to import them into iMovie
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 132.06 sec
Processor usage: 100% .... iMac G4/800: 151.45 sec Processor
usage: 100%
The iMac reads CDs at 24X and the Power Mac
at 32X
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 12.42 sec
Processor usage: 100% .... iMac G4/800: 13.31 sec Processor
usage: 100%
Multitasking
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 175.99 sec
Processor usage: 100% .... iMac G4/800: 224.14 sec Processor
usage: 100%
An MP3 encode, Search & Replace in AppleWorks
and Folder Copy are all carried out at the same time
Actual time: Power Mac G4/800 : 516.37 sec
Processor usage: 100% .... iMac G4/800: 579.7618 sec Processor
usage: 100%
Two Sorenson encodes are performed at the
same time
Gaming
Actual fps: Power Mac G4/800 : 18 fps ....
iMac G4/800: 14.5 fps
The iMac has the NVIDIA GeForce2 MX with 32 MB of DDR RAM
in a 2x AGP slot, cand the Power Mac ATI RADEON 7500 with
32MB DDR SDRAM in 4x AGP slot.. The faster memory system,
graphics card slot conspire to put the Power Mac over the
top
Actual fps: Power Mac G4/800 : 19 fps ....
iMac G4/800: 16.1 fps
The iMac has the NVIDIA GeForce2 MX with 32
MB of DDR RAM in a 2x AGP slot, and the Power Mac the ATI
RADEON 7500 with 32MB DDR SDRAM in 4x AGP slot. On the lowest
quality setting of Giants
you only pick up a couple of frames.
|