** This application does not run native on the Intel processor
A note on performance. As you can see for applications that run native on the Intel chip, the iMac is much faster. If you have an application that can take advantage of dual processors, or have a work strategy to maximize processor usage, the iMac is nearly twice the performance of the PowerBook.
If you have follow up questions about these results contact us again
Tell your friends about our service
http://macreviewzone.com/html/reviews/guides/individual/index.shtml
Disclaimer: Remember to treat all benchmark scores with caution, and do not rely on performance scores from us in making mission critical decisions. We endeavor to make the information we provide as accurate as possible, but make no direct or expressed guarantee that this is the case
On Mar 4, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Victor wrote:
This message was sent from:
http://macreviewzone.com/html/reviews/guides/individual/comparison_request.shtml
------------------------- COMMENTS -------------------------
= Current Model = Previous Model = New Item Available = Unavailable = Unknown/Delay = Installation Fee ($20 to $40)
Extras = Bundled Items
Closeout, Open Box, Refrubished and Used
G4 PowerBooks 17 Inch
Price - Condition - Warranty -Store
Copyright 1996-2007 by Cider Press Publishing LLC all rights reserved.
MacSpeedZone is not authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple
Computer. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iPod, iBook, iMac, eMac, and
PowerBook are registered trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc. Additional
company
and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby
acknowledged.