Updated:Tue, Oct 18, 2005
Processor Performance
Multitasking Performance
Graphics Performance
Game Performance
Drive Performance
Past Results
Below you will find performance results for most of the currently shipping machines. This will, hopefully, give you an feel for the relative performances. We will be adding new machines on an on-going basis ... so check back once in a while.
Don't see performance information on the Mac you are interested in? Send a request for a performance comparison between any two Macs.
"Real World" Tests
For timed scores, lower numbers are better. For the CineBench & Game scores higher numbers are better. Of course the higher the percentage, the better the performance.
IMPORTANT: Scores marked with a indicate that we had to adjust an old score to make it compatible with a new testing methodology. While we have tried to be as accurate as possible in this adjustment, unforeseen errors may occur. We just want you to be a little more cautious of these scores than other scores on this page.
|
Processor Performance
Graphics Performance
Game Performance
Drive Performance
Application Performance
Multitasking Performance
Past Results
Don't see performance information on the Mac you are interested in? Send a request for a custom performance comparison between any two Macs (example)
Processor
Machine
Power Mac |
Score |
Percentage
of Base |
| Base Machine - Power Mac G4/1 GHz Dual Processor - M8667LL//A |
96 |
100% |
July 2005 iBooks
|
| iBook 12" G4/1.33GHz - M9846LL/A |
121 |
126% |
| iBook 14" G4/1.42GHz - M9848LL/A |
130 |
135% |
October 2004 iBooks
|
| iBook 12" G4/1.2GHz - M9623LL/A |
108 |
112% |
| iBook 14" G4/1.33GHz (Combo) - M9627LL/A |
120 |
125% |
| iBook 14" G4/1.33GHz (Super) - M9628LL/A |
118 |
123% |
| January 2005 PowerBooks |
| PowerBooks 12" G4/1.5GHz (Combo) - M9690LL/A |
135 |
141% |
| PowerBooks 12" G4/1.5GHz (Super) - M9691LL/A |
136 |
142% |
| PowerBooks 15" G4/1.5GHz - M9676LL/A |
136 |
142% |
| PowerBooks 15" G4/1.67GHz - M9677LL/A |
147 |
153% |
| PowerBooks 17" G4/1.67GHz - M9689LL/A |
149 |
155% |
|
CineBench 2003 consists of a series of tests. This one, tests basic single CPU processing performance. . You can download the CineBench program to run on your own machine and compare scores. We used the version of CineBench that is not optimized for the G5 for this test. The scores above are actual scores ... not timed tests. Higher numbers are better
The iTunes Encode, Photoshop Render and Word Macro tests are all run at the same time.
Machine
Power Mac |
Score |
Percentage
of Base |
| Base Machine - Power Mac G4/1 GHz Dual Processor - M8667LL//A |
168 |
100% |
July 2005 iBooks
|
| iBook 12" G4/1.33GHz - M9846LL/A |
601 |
358% |
| iBook 14" G4/1.42GHz - M9848LL/A |
616 |
367% |
October 2004 iBooks
|
| iBook 12" G4/1.2GHz - M9623LL/A |
305 |
182% |
| iBook 14" G4/1.33GHz (Combo) - M9627LL/A |
326 |
194% |
| iBook 14" G4/1.33GHz (Super) - M9628LL/A |
323 |
192% |
| January 2005 PowerBooks |
| PowerBooks 12" G4/1.5GHz (Combo) - M9690LL/A |
512 |
305% |
| PowerBooks 12" G4/1.5GHz (Super) - M9691LL/A |
510 |
304% |
| PowerBooks 15" G4/1.5GHz - M9676LL/A |
791 |
471% |
| PowerBooks 15" G4/1.67GHz - M9677LL/A |
834 |
496% |
| PowerBooks 17" G4/1.67GHz - M9689LL/A |
794 |
473% |
|
This part of the CineBench program relies on the graphics card for graphics rendering. Download the program and run your own test.
Machine
Power Mac |
Score
in FPS |
Percentage
of Base |
| Base Machine - Power Mac G4/1 GHz Dual Processor - M8667LL//A |
17 |
100% |
July 2005 iBooks
|
| iBook 12" G4/1.33GHz - M9846LL/A |
20 |
118% |
| iBook 14" G4/1.42GHz - M9848LL/A |
20 |
118% |
October 2004 iBooks
|
| iBook 12" G4/1.2GHz - M9623LL/A |
12.5 |
74%  |
| iBook 14" G4/1.33GHz (Combo) - M9627LL/A |
12.3 |
72% 
|
| iBook 14" G4/1.33GHz (Super) - M9628LL/A |
12.3 |
72%  |
| January 2005 PowerBooks |
| PowerBooks 12" G4/1.5GHz (Combo) - M9690LL/A |
14.9 |
88% |
| PowerBooks 12" G4/1.5GHz (Super) - M9691LL/A |
14.7 |
86% |
| PowerBooks 15" G4/1.5GHz - M9676LL/A |
27.5 |
162% |
| PowerBooks 15" G4/1.67GHz - M9677LL/A |
27.5 |
162% |
| PowerBooks 17" G4/1.67GHz - M9689LL/A |
33 |
194% |
|
4x4 EVO2 is a demanding racing game. It appears that this game is much more graphics card dependent than processor dependent. The scores above are actual scores (frames per second) ... not timed tests. Higher numbers are better
Graphics - Interface
Machine
Power Mac |
Score
in Seconds |
Percentage
of Base |
| Base Machine - Power Mac G4/1 GHz Dual Processor - M8667LL//A |
12.37 |
100% |
July 2005 iBooks
|
| iBook 12" G4/1.33GHz - M9846LL/A |
14.24 |
87% |
| iBook 14" G4/1.42GHz - M9848LL/A |
12.96 |
95% |
October 2004 iBooks
|
| iBook 12" G4/1.2GHz - M9623LL/A |
26.36 |
47%  |
| iBook 14" G4/1.33GHz (Combo) - M9627LL/A |
24.98 |
50%  |
| iBook 14" G4/1.33GHz (Super) - M9628LL/A |
25.20 |
49%  |
| January 2005 PowerBooks |
| PowerBooks 12" G4/1.5GHz (Combo) - M9690LL/A |
12.33 |
100% |
| PowerBooks 12" G4/1.5GHz (Super) - M9691LL/A |
12.23 |
100% |
| PowerBooks 15" G4/1.5GHz - M9676LL/A |
NA |
NA% |
| PowerBooks 15" G4/1.67GHz - M9677LL/A |
NA |
NA% |
| PowerBooks 17" G4/1.67GHz - M9689LL/A |
NA |
NA% |
|
Let 1K Windows Bloom is a simple carbon application that opens and closes 1,000 windows. This gauges how fast screen redraws are taking place. You can download the small program to run on your machine and compare your scores, to the ones here.
Hard Drive Performance - Multi-File
The copy folder test not only stresses drive performance but also takes advantage of faster processing capability & caching schemes.
Hard Drive Performance Single File
In the single file test the the processor & caching capability of the machine is less of a factor.
Don't see performance information on the Mac you are interested in? Send a request for a performance comparison between any two Macs.
Disclaimer performance benchmarks are only a guide to relative performance, and to a certain extent limited. The only performance benchmark that will have full meaning for you, will be the one you run, on your new machine, using your applications and employing your work flow. Given this, while we believe that the information we will provide you will give a general guide to relative performance, and we will endeavor to make sure that it is as accurate as possible, we offer no implied or actual guarantee that this is so. People who need mission critical data, should be doing performance testing in-house.
Previous Portable Performance ...
Compare These Results To Others ...
|